"cnn tonight" with don lemon starts right now. >> maybe the parade has bone spurs. >> ooh. did you burn a lot of calories coming up with that one, d-lemon? >> okay. i'm going to get you now. remember you were asking me about my background? >> yeah. oh, that's strong. what's in that, cuckoo juice? >> let's get after it. wait a minute. >> see you later. >> let's get after it. >> i'm not anything like that. >> i know. >> you don't need glasses, by the way. >> okay. well, these are prescription. >> sure. >> tell my eye doctor that. >> i will. bye. >> thanks, chris. have a great weekend. this is "cnn tonight," don lemon. we have breaking news in the russian investigation. robert mueller is recommending a sentence of up to six months in jail for former trump campaign staffer george papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty to lying to the fbi.

the white house has reportedly drafted multiple documents revoking security clearances of the critics the president wants to punish. and one senior official says they have discussed timing the release of those documents as a distraction during news cycles unfavorable to the president. that's according to the "washington post." and this latest effort to distract and deflect comes as 60 former cia officials have signed a letter warning president trump that "the country will be weakened if there is a political litmus test applied before seasoned experts are allowed to share their views." that's on top of 15 former intel officials who've already issued a similar statement in response to the president's decision earlier this week to revoke the security clearance of ex-cia chief john brennan. but the president, well, he says this. >> there's no silence. if anything i'm giving them a bigger voice. many people don't know who he is. now he has a bigger voice and that's okay with me because i like taking on voices like that.

>> that's as president trump tries to defend his former campaign chairman as a jury in virginia ends a second day of deliberations in the manafort trial with no verdict in sight. >> i think the whole manafort trial is very sad when you look at what's going on. i think it's a very sad day for our country. >> well, now that is absolutely true. it is a very sad day for our country. it's a very sad day for our country when a candidate for the highest office in the nation puts his campaign in hands of man like paul manafort. the man donald trump chose to help him get elected is on trial on charges that could land him in jail for the rest of his life if he's convicted on all of them. but the president rather than keeping quiet and letting justice take its course lashes out at the man prosecuting manafort and that's robert mueller. >> mr. mueller is highly conflicted. in fact, comey is like his best friend. i could go into conflict after

conflict. but sadly, mr. mueller is conflicted. but let him write his report. we did nothing. there's no collusion. >> here we go again. the old i know you are, but what am i strategy. robert mueller is a former director of the fbi who was nominated by president george w. bush. his appointment as special counsel has been upheld by four federal judges. most recently by a judge appointed to the bench by president trump himself. but that didn't stop trump from returning to the baseless charge he's thrown around again and again. >> look, i say it. i say it again. that whole situation is a rigged witch hunt. it's a totally rigged deal. they should be looking at the other side. >> so the fact is, mueller's investigation has already resulted in 191 criminal charges

against 35 defendants and five guilty pleas so far. and in the face of all this, the white house is scrambling to spin the president's actions. kellyanne conway today offering a defense you might call pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. >> why is everybody so obsessed with the president of the united states? you can't even finish a sentence without mentioning his name five times. it's kind of weird. >> well, donald trump is a man who always needs an enemy. someone to blame. especially now. with ex-aide omarosa potentially holding as many as 200 secretly recorded tapes of team trump and with the possibility of a presidential interview with robert mueller looming. mueller, who is investigating russia's attack on our democracy during the 2016 election and whether anyone from the trump campaign was involved. but president trump doesn't see it as an attack on our democracy, one that should be battled with all the weapons at our disposal. he sees it as an attack on him. on his legitimacy.

he sees it as questioning his election victory. and if there's one thing trump cannot tolerate, it's anybody who questions his most cherished belief. that he's a winner. i want to bring in cnn political analyst carl bernstein. cnn presidential historian douglas brinkley. and cnn national security analyst juliette kayyem. good evening. happen friday to you. let's start with this breaking news with the special counsel recommending up to six months of jail time for george papadopoulos. remember, he's the one who pleaded guilty to lying to investigators. but the special counsel is arguing that lies have consequences because they're saying he impeded the investigation and that his cooperation has been disappointing. what's your reaction? >> it's quite interesting and enlightening to see what happened with papadopoulos who has been sort of a hero of the resistance. a lot of people thought he's giving this much information. it's clear from the documents

tonight that were filed that he's been anything but. he's not been forthcoming. they actually believe him to be stalling on information. and the key point for your audience to know is that there was a professor who basically -- massoud, who basically was sort of the -- a potentially central point of linking the russians with the trump campaign. he was in the united states and papadopoulos lies made it very difficult for the mueller team to be able to interview him or to even detain him. he's now no longer in the united states. and they're unable to have those conversations with this professor. it's based on one person and sort of a missed opportunity but the bigger point is you don't lie. even if you're lying and say you want to be helpful, if you're not helpful, we want you to go to jail. >> so we now have two letters, juliette, protesting the trump handling over the security clearances. one which by 15 former intelligence officers.

one by 60 former cia officials. i want to read from the second letter. okay? it says, "we believe equally strongly that former government officials have the right to express their unclassified views on what they see as critical national security issues without fearing of being punished for doing so." so these two letters are a striking rebuke by 75 former officials who worked for republican and democratic administrations after trump revoked john brennan's clearance. >> that's exactly right. so let me just begin with how sort of -- how odd this is for this group of people -- both letters actually. mostly these are people you and i have never heard of. they don't like to be in the rough and tumble of politics. they don't consider themselves political. but because the trump presidency has been so undermining of america's not only legitimacy in the outside world but of course our own internal national security when it comes to our voting integrity, they spoke up. i just -- put it in perspective.

bill shine, who's now the communications director in charge of sort of hiding decades of harassment at fox news, and sarah huckabee sanders, who essentially lies every day to the american public, a public that's paying for her, they're in charge of determining whose security clearances are going to be revoked at what time. right? because the trump people want it to be done at times in which he's facing bad news. and what they don't realize is the trump white house every day is facing bad news. it's like the idea they are waiting for some quiet. they're the bad news. right? it's not like the outside world is creating it for them. we're going to see these happen. trkts as you've heard all night, it's pathetic. in the end it's just pathetic. >> it was striking to see the names scrolling of the 60 people who signed the letter as you were speaking about it.

carl, i've got to ask you. the "washington post" is reporting tonight that the white house has drafted more clearance cancellations. i'm going to read from that. "trump wants to sign most, if not all of them, said one senior white house official who indicated that communications aides including press secretary sarah huckabee sanders and bill shine the newly named deputy chief of staff have discussed the optimum times to release them as a distraction during unfavorable news cycles." juliette touched on this a little bit. they're going to be pulling these clearances and putting this information out when they need to distract from something. that's blatantly political. >> of course it's blatantly political. but we have to go to the very basis of what trump is doing here. and that is he is as part of a cover-up, is trying to undermine and bury the mueller investigation at every turn. and that includes through all this diversionary action. i've talked to people in the white house, lawyers involved

defending some former white house people, people in his administration and all of them say trump is both in a panic right now about the mueller investigation and where it is leading in terms of investigating collusion involving key members of his administration and his campaign, perhaps himself, perhaps his family. and we are also witnessing right now an unprecedented revolt. let's look at what these statements by these 65 officials of the intelligence community really are. since the establishment of the intelligence apparatus of this country in 1947 and 1948, there has never been anything like this. a revolt. let's call it for what it is. by the most highly regarded intelligence professionals against the conduct of the president of the united states. a stinging rebuke in which they picture him as a despot who does not believe in free speech. that's really what this is

partly about. it's part of enemies of the people and trying to characterize those who might question him as being enemies of the people. >> douglas brinkley, i want to play this for you. this is john brennan on msnbc tonight. then we'll talk about it. here it is. >> he's drunk on power. he really is. and i think he's abusing the powers of that office. i think right now this country is in a crisis in terms of what mr. trump has done and is liable to do. and so are the republicans on the hill who have given him a pass, are they going to wait for a disaster to happen before they actually find their backgrounds and spines to speak up against somebody who clearly, clearly is not carrying out his responsibilities? >> what's your reaction, douglas? >> that brennan is an american hero for speaking up. his tenure at the cia was impeccable. we owe him so much.

and he's now leading the crusade really to tell people that donald trump is unfit for command. these are the best and the brightest, the wisest people on foreign policy and intelligence that are writing these letters, some out of retirement, saying this president is a disaster for the country going on right now. and it's not partisan. it's patriotism. people need to speak up. the shock i think in history is going to be how timid these republican senators are. they're so worried about the mid-terms, so worried about donald trump tweeteding against them, so paranoid about being mocked by rush limbaugh or sean hannity that they're cowering right now. and it's a gop that at beast they're saying, well, let's get through the kavanaugh hearings, let's get a supreme court justice and then we'll grapple with donald trump after the election -- >> but won't there be something else down the road, douglas? where they'll say now that we've gotten through that let's just get through this and then it will just continue to go on.

go on, douglas. sorry to cut you off. >> no, no, don, you're right. that's the problem. we're in dangerous waters. just like omarosa doing her 200 tapes every week. she's a student of donald trump who is now going to be taking away security clearances from people with, you know, 20, 30-plus years careers serving the united states in the best and most noble way. everybody needs to speak up and defend brennan right now. i've been surprised that former president george w. bush staying so quiet. eight years a president of the united states. his father been head of the cia. the cia is named after bush. speak up and denounce donald trump because some of these other people on the list aren't household names where bush is. >> juliette, is this how a purge starts? >> it is. but as most things that trump tries to do, it is backfiring. you know, as doug's just said. the amplification. i mean, basically what happened with john brennan is you've got

people who really had been relatively quiet during this period. they were part -- they still believed in the bipartisan national security establishment. they went to all the fancy conferences. and then you fire john brennan and all of a sudden this group of 15 or 16 is now unified to say what a disaster donald trump is for our national security and how seemingly over his head he is in terms of being able to understand a larger need that the united states has an interest outside of donald trump. it's how donald trump would like a purge to begin and we have to anticipate more will happen. but i think we should be heartened by the pushback. it's not the same as being president of the united states. but there is a significant pushback that people are talking about in the agencies and the leadership is certainly expressing. i've always said i can't believe

no one's quit this administration. i think it's time for dan coats to man up, so to speak. i think it's been clear he does not like some of the behaviors by the trump administration. he's the head of national intelligence. he was caught off guard at the aspen institute and he did not know of this purging. in some weird way coats is expendable unlike mattis, who i think it would be a disaster if he left. i think it's time. >> stand by. we'll talk more about clearances. when we come back, no sign of a verdict from the jury in the paul manafort trial. the first trial to come out of mueller investigation. the president is already trying to defend his former campaign chairman calling the whole thing very sad. but in a sign of things to come mueller's team has nearly three times the evidence for the upcoming manafort second trial. -morning. -morning. -what do we got? -keep an eye on that branch. might get windy. have a good shift.

fire pit. last use -- 0600. i'd stay close. morning. ♪ get ready to switch. protected by flo. should say, "protected by alan and jamie." -right? -should it? when you bundle home and auto... run, alan! ...you get more than just savings. you get 'round-the-clock protection.

directly to investors. and now we have zero account fees for brokerage accounts. at fidelity, those zeros really add up. ♪ maybe i'll win, saved by zero ♪ but, with more exercise and a change in diet, it can be reversed. i've tried exercising. it just makes me hungry. for bacon. i love bacon, too. and who really likes to exercise? not me. me neither! nobody! [both laugh] so, we're good? what? oh, you still have prediabetes. big time.

let's continue our conversation. carl, i want to play what the president said about the current justice department official bruce ohr who trump criticized for his connections to the steele dossier. here it is. >> i think bruce ohr is a disgrace. i suspect i'll be taking it away very quickly. i think that bruce ohr is a disgrace. >> carl, what makes this all the more unusual is bruce ohr is a current employee who's been demoted and he's also never publicly criticized trump.

>> he has not. but again, this is part of a reign of terror that the president is attempting to throw down over those parts of the justice system in this country so he can work his own cover-up and undermine the mueller investigation and whip up his base. we keep talking here about whether or not donald trump is fit to be president of the united states. the other guests tonight have talked about his unfitness in their term. and it's interesting. you and i talked a year ago about what members of congress, republican members were telling me then that they privately believe that donald trump was unfit to be president of the united states. they questioned his stability. right now, the same thing is going on as i talk to those same people in congress. they believe his stability is questionable at the moment as the mueller investigation closes

in. they believe he's unfit to be the president of the united states, many republicans in congress, and yet, as has been said here, we see their own craven disregard for the national interest and for their own election and their fear of the base of donald trump. rather than allow a consensus develop as these facts come in about the cover up as we watch the president of the united states today attempt to reach and influence a jury. whoever heard of a sitting president trying to influence a jury. this is about the fitness of the president of the united states or unfitness to hold this office. the question now and what the intelligence officers have done today is to finally raise the question is a consensus going to develop that donald trump's actions render him unfit?

>> to his point, douglas, the justice department says that ohr is not involved with the special counsel's investigation. so you know, he says he's trying to influence the special counsel's investigation. how will history show this as far as -- i guess it depends on what comes out of this investigation. >> it's joe mccarthy tactics run amok. but joe mccarthy never was president of the united states. he did damage as a senator from wisconsin but he was shut down by eisenhower, the u.s. army, edward r. murrow, and others. in this case, the mccarthyite's in the white house. he's got dictatorial penchants and he's struggling for his life right now. as carl is very much articulating he's got to survive this onslaught coming on right now. if not, if the democrats in the midterms take congress, they will move to impeach him and

he'll be -- have his whole next year just tied up in a legal knot. so he's making the takedown play right now, and is going to be using these revoking of people like ohr and others' security clearance as bait for the media week after week whenever he wants to unleash. and he will when -- then he'll start talking about these people and mocking them in rallies around the country. >> juliette, i have something quick -- >> let me add one thing if i may, carl. >> hold on, carl. i've got to get to manafort. juliette, quickly, because i think it's important, this week is a sign to you that this is a failed presidency. can you talk about that quickly? >> well, just from the beginning. you had the press secretary trying -- not able to deny the president used the n word on a videotape and then you have a president who if you close your eyes when he's talking -- i always urge people to do this. sounds not right. i'm not a doctor.

it is someone who is clearly fighting demons that he's creating. he will -- he just goes through all these things. he's talking about some midlevel justice department attorney as if he's the prime minister of great britain. donald trump is the president of the united states. he punches down incredibly well. but because he only punches down, it shows how failed a presidency this is. i'm not saying he's not doing incredible damage, damage that will take years to evaluate. but if i'm in the trump white house right now and i'm speaking to them right now, there is not much of a future for you outside of this white house because what happened this week was the entire national security establishment said you are not welcome anymore. so unless you quit, relatively soon, you are not welcome anymore outside of this cocoon. >> oh, wow. so carl, i want to get on to paul manafort. i know you wanted to make a

point but i want to talk to you about that. the jury is on day two of deliberations in the paul manafort trial. i want to play what the president said about manafort this morning. here it is. >> will you pardon paul manafort? >> i don't talk about that now. i don't talk about that. i think the whole manafort trial is very sad. when you look at what's going on -- i think it's a very sad day for our country. he worked for me for a very short period of time. but you know what? he happens to be a very good person. i think it's very sad what they've done to paul manafort. >> so listen, carl, we don't know how the jury's going to rule here. but if they say manafort is guilty, do you think the president would pardon him? >> look, do i think? i would speculate that he has thought and discussed with people around him pardons for many people. i know that to be a fact. but the first part of the clip that we just heard is he says i don't want to talk about that.

and the question that was asked was will you pardon? and that's what he doesn't want to talk about. he is sending signals to mr. papadopoulos, to paul manafort, to others that he might well pardon them. he wants them to believe that he will pardon them so that they will not be forthcoming with the mueller investigation. let me say one last thing about what's going on. that is we also heard trump earlier talk about let mr. mueller issue his report and say what he has to say. i'm paraphrasing him there. in fact, i've talked to people in the white house who say that increasingly the president has said to others in the white house that he wants to bury the mueller report when it is written and make sure that it never reaches the congress of the united states but rather he the president, he believes, and he probably is right here, has

the power that the report not go to the congress of the united states, that it stay within the deputy attorney general's purview, rod rosenstein or whoever is in that position, and that seems to be the case, that that could happen under the guidelines for the special prosecutor. we keep coming back to the question of why is there a cover-up? why isn't the president saying hey, i'm an open book with russia, let's open the books up, let's get everybody in here, show what happened, show what didn't happen, get on with the business of the nation. instead we see the president of the united states who may be the gravest threat of all to the national security of the united states, stand in helsinki next to vladmir putin, obviously trying to stroke vladmir putin. what the hell happened in helsinki? we still don't know. the secretary of state doesn't know. the national security advisor to the president, mr. bolton, does

not know. only trump and putin know what occurred there and there is grave concern among those in this administration as to what happened there. so we have a president who is a threat to the national security, not the 65 intelligence officers who signed the challenge to him today. >> douglas, back to manafort, his lawyers reacting to what the president said. watch this. >> do you think that the jury deliberating longer it favors your client? >> i do. and he does. >> i'm very happy to hear from the president and that he's supporting mr. manafort. >> that is so unusual and has to break some sort of precedent if not a rule if not maybe a law. i don't know, doug. what do you think? >> it's wrong on so many levels to be interfering, basically trying to jury tamper as president of the united states instead of staying out of it. it tells you how desperate this president is.

paul manafort may be spending his life in jail. and donald trump wants to signal to him if he's found guilty on most of these charges that somewhere along the line he'll let him out. when will that be? let's say he doesn't run a second term, donald trump, he can't. he still can pardon him at any time. so he's trying desperately to keep manafort close as he can to him without being caught. >> thank you all. i appreciate it. have a good weekend. >> thank you. when we come back, blunt words for president trump from the daughter of another president. quote, "my father would never have stood for this." that's from ronald reagan's daughter, patty davis. she's going to join me about how she is taking a stand against president trump. right after this break.

does your business internet provider promise a lot? let's see who delivers more. comcast business gives you gig-speed in more places. the others don't. we offer up to 6 hours of 4g wireless network backup. everyone else, no way. we let calls from any of your devices come from your business number. them, not so much. we let you keep an eye on your business from anywhere. the others? nope! for a limited time, when you get fast, reliable internet, you can add voice for just $24.95 more per month.

call or go online today. call or go on line today. something he doesn't often do. but the 39 g9 president is blunt in his "washington post" profile saying "i think he is a human disaster. in human rights and taking care of people and treating people equal." and tonight we're learning what another president might have thought, and that's ronald reagan. ronald reagan's daughter, patty davis, has an opinion piece in the wshtd wsht titled "my father, ronald reagan, would never have stood for this." patty davis joins me now. good evening to you. thank you so much for joining us, patty. >> good evening. thank you for having me. >> absolutely. you just heard president carter, his comments about president trump. former presidents don't often speak out about the current one, the sitting president.

but president trump seems to be testing that practice. what do you think your father would have to say? >> i think my father would be appalled. but i think he would also be really heartbroken at where this country has come to and where we have sunk to. and i think he would be frightened at the use of the word "enemy" toward the media. you know, the word enemy is really a very strategic word, if you think about it. because if you call someone the enemy, you've dehumanized them. you've made them into a target really. and i think it's even broader than just calling the media the enemy. you've stoked fear in people. you've stoked fear in this country just by invoking the word "enemy." i heard a quote years ago that i believe was attributed ed td t

ceacescu, the romanian dictator executed in '89. i'm not 100% positive but the quote was you can do whatever you want if you keep the people frightened enough. i think that is the agenda of this administration. i think my father would see it that way because my father, unlike this president, knew history. he knew what happened in nazi germany. he knew what has happened historically in russia and in other tyrannical regimes. >> it's interesting when you talk to -- because the first time i thought about this, you know, he calls the press the enemy of the people and then he calls russia a competitor. he thinks the press is worse -- >> yeah. >> -- than russia or someone like vladimir putin who's a dictator and people -- and has people murdered in his country. listen to the way he talks about the press. watch this. >> we have a very crooked media. >> we're also thrilled to have a lot of the fake news media in the back.

>> good morning. the legitimate media and the fake news media. >> it's time to expose the crooked media deceptions and to challenge the media for their role in formenting divisions. >> a few days ago i called the fake news the enemy of the people and they are. they are the enemy of the people. >> how dangerous is this tone? >> i think it's incredibly dangerous because here's the thing. donald trump and the people around him told us what they were going to do. steve bannon talked about blowing things up and tearing things down and what was it, deconstructing the administrative state or something like that. it was something -- deconstructing something. they told us what they were going to do.

donald trump stood in front of people, the press, america and talked about how bad america was right now and he alone could fix it. they told us what they were going to do. in the same way that in nazi germany, hitler told people what they were going to do and assumed that no one was going to get in his way. and donald trump has assumed that no one would get in his way. so far, if you look at the silence of congress, he's right. >> what do you think about -- >> our system of -- go on. >> what do you think about the republican party now? no one -- people behind closed doors, as you know, or away from cameras or recordings, people will say i don't agree with this, i can't believe he's doing that and they have disdain for what the president's doing, but no one will say it publicly. what do you think about the republican party now? >> i think it's so cowardly. it's like they all turned into eunuchs. i apologize to any eunuchs out

there who are offended by that comparison. but they really have. you know? it doesn't matter what you say behind closed doors. it matters what you say out in public to this country. that's what people elected you to do. to speak to us. >> there's always been tension between the presidents and the press. your father no exception. but you say he tried to reach compromises with the media. explain that. >> well, the example that i gave in this piece was up at his ranch they were initially -- they had long lenses up on a hillside way far away from the ranch house. but they could see actually into the ranch house. he said, well, this is not going to do. i mean, they can't -- this is really an intrusion. so we have to reach a compromise. but before they came to that compromise he stepped outside of

the ranch house, swayed like something was wrong with him, clutched his chest and fell to the ground. >> right. >> and stayed there for a couple of seconds. felt like he was having a heart attack. and then stood up and smiled and waved at them up on the hill. right? the secret service was in on this prank. otherwise, they would all have been rushed to hospitals with heart attacks or something. you know. so he did have a sense of humor about it. but he also had enormous -- he had enormous respect for the press. and you know, the iran-contra scand scandal, he initially came in front of the press, came in front of america and said there were no arms for hostages. and i think it was like the next day that ed meese came to him with a document and said, actually, mr. president, there were -- we found out there were. he went back in front of press, i think that night. he went back in front of the country and back in front of the media and said i sincerely

believed that i was right in what i told you yesterday but as it turns out i was wrong. >> that would not happen with this administration. they'll figure out a way to say that the information you had was wrong and they'll say the intelligence is not accurate about that. i've got to run, though, patti. thank you so much. you're welcome back anytime. it's a pleasure to have you on. thanks. >> thank you, don. when we come back, the new york times reporting that omarosa could have as many as 200 secretly recorded tapes. so is it any surprise that a worried white house is trying to change the subject? ♪ ♪ can world-renowned artist red hong yi use the chase mobile app® to pay practically anyone, at any bank? ♪ ♪ yes. but this isn't for just anyone. chase. make more of what's yours. i knew at that exact moment ... i'm beating this. my main focus was to find a team of doctors. it's not just picking a surgeon, it's picking the care team and feeling secure in where you are.

visit cancercenter.com/breast and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free.

california had the worst wildfire season on record. scientists say, our weather is becoming more extreme and we all have to be better prepared. that's why pg&e is adopting new and additional safety precautions to help us monitor and respond to dangerous weather. hi, i'm allison bagley, a meteorologist with pg&e's community wildfire safety program. we're working now, to enhance our weather forecasting capabilities, building a network of new weather stations

to identify when and where extreme wildfire conditions may occur, so we can respond faster and better. we're installing cutting edge technology to provide real-time mapping and tracking of weather patterns. and we use this information in partnership with first responders and california's emergency response systems. to learn more about the community wildfire safety program and how you can help keep your home and community safe, visit pge.com/wildfiresafety breaking news. the white house has reportedly drafted multiple documents revoking security clearances of former officials president trump wants to punish. the "washington post" is reporting one senior official says they've discussed timing the release of those documents to distract from news cycles

unfavorable to the president. let's discuss now. cnn political commentator scott jennings is here, former special assistant to president george w. bush. also republican strategist rick wilson the author of "everything trump touches dies." gentlemen-g evening to you. rick, i'm going to start with you. how much is omarosa getting under this president's skin if he's resorting to revoking security clearances as a way to change the narrative? >> i think omarosa is something that terrifies donald trump tremendously because she is a creature of the same reality television ecosystem he emerges from. and she knows all his tricks and she has a lot of tapes. and she knows the psychology of donald trump is built from something that started in the new york city tabloid environment and grew into professional, you know, reality tv and she understands all of donald trump's psychology in terms of disrupting his narratives and in terms of disrupting his storylines and she's using it to her very best advantage right now and he's very nervous about her.

>> scott, the new york time s reporting that omarosa may have as many as 200 tapes. what do you think the president is most worried about? >> well, i mean, i don't think it's just the president. it's all the people around the president. if you were in a meeting with omarosa now you're reading this in the newspaper thinking did i ever say something in a meeting that could be taken out of context. >> were you ever in a meeting with her? >> reported in a way that's unfavorable to me -- me, no. i've never met omarosa. but yeah, i mean, look, if you are in the white house and you have some expectation of privacy so you can be candid either with other staff or with the president and you find out people may have been taping that, i'm sure that has caused panic to run through several folks. i'm not saying anybody has done anything wrong. but you know, anytime you take audio tapes out of context you can be made to look bad. so i think the president frequently punches down at his critics that he probably should just leave alone. i read he was given advice to leave omarosa alone and that he didn't take it. i wish he would have taken it because i think he's amplified

her voice with the way he treated her this week. >> you know, we have seen this pattern before, rick, when the president was dealing with his negative headlines after siding with putin in helsinki, remember? he threatened iran on twitter. when he was dealing with the release of michael cohen's tape he tweeted about the nfl national anthem, that debate. is this how the president handles controversy, he starts a new one to get the media spinning onto a new topic so we'll talk about something else. but sometimes the one he gets us spinning onto is worse than the one he's trying to cover up or get out of the headlines. >> absolutely. donald trump, his main strategy is to blow up the last thing he's done by making a huge new controversy. and so the media follows that very frequently. look, is omarosa the be-all, end-all of this administration's problems? absolutely not. he has robert mueller breathing down his neck.

he has a collapsing republican field for the 2018 congressional elections. he's got a whole host of problems. but he would rather fight about omarosa than he would talk about robert mueller in a real and substantive way. he would rather fight about omarosa and make omarosa into the center of the story than focus on anything else that has to do with his capitulation to russia or his failure with north korea or his disastrous trade war that's brewing. he'd love to talk about talk radio and reality tv and all the distractions all day long. >> all right. both of you stick around. when we come back, the president cancelling his big military parade after costs skyrocketed. and i mean skyrocketed. wait until you hear just how much this parade would have cost. plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques.

and for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. since joining ninehahi, ubmonths ago,o. my priority has been to listen to you... to cities and communities, and to my own employees. i've seen a lot of good. we've changed the way people get around. we've provided new opportunities. but moving forward, it's time to move in a new direction.

and i want you to know just how excited i am, to write uber's next chapter, with you. one of our core values as a company, is to always do the right thing. and if there are times when we fall short, we commit to being open, taking responsibility for the problem, and fixing it. this begins with new leadership, and a new culture. and you're going to see improvements to our service. like enhanced background checks, 24/7 customer support, better pickups, and ride quality, for both riders, and drivers. you've got my word, that we're charting an even better road for uber, and for those that rely on us every day. ♪

president trump canceling his promised military parade. putting the blame on washington, d.c. officials. back with scott jennings and rick wilson. okay. so scott, an administration official is telling cnn that this parade could run as high as $92 million. wasn't this president supposed to be someone who was going to cut back on spending? isn't that sort of a republican mantra, is to spend less? >> yeah. although i think the idea of a military parade wasn't a bad one. it's been a long time since we had a national military parade. i think maybe since the end of the first gulf war. fewer than 1% of us serve in the military. i think there's a widening gulf between those who serve and a lot of places in this country. we don't know anybody who's in the military, a lot of us. especially if you live in an urban area or around a university ecosystem. i think the reasons to have a national parade were good. i'm not surprised it is a high price tag to have something like that in washington.

a way to pivot out of this for the president could be to have it somewhere else. perhaps in a larger media market but in the middle of the country where it might be cheaper to do it. but we've been -- >> what's the reasoning behind -- how would a parade -- >> i thought it was a good idea. >> how would a parade help with -- i'm trying to just follow you here. how would it help with people who -- wouldn't it be -- wouldn't it be better if the $92 million went to like veterans affairs or paying our military more or getting them better equipment? isn't that a better way to honor them, than just through pageantry? >> well, the congress just did appropriate a whole bunch more money to the military and veterans affairs. that's been taken care of. there have been several secretaries of defense who have talked about how parades of this nature can engender better morale and pride in our national military. look, i understand the high price tag on this. i've gone back and forth myself on the need for this parade. but the more i read about how much it could engender more

goodwill for our armed forces around the country since we haven't done it for so long and since we've been at war since 9/11 the more i think you know, what these guys have been fighting our battles and they deserve to be honored and if it costs a little bit of money to do it maybe we could do it ch p cheaper in a different place than washington but i think we ought to do it. >> $92 million is a lot of dough. go ahead, rick. >> well, look, i think my friend scott is right on the point, honoring our troops is a meritorious action. i think this parade, unfortunately, was about aggrandizing donald trump's ego because he likes things that go boom. and he was very much wanting to have himself as the sort of gener generalissimo figure to be watching over the troops parading past to honor him. i don't think donald trump really has, you know, anything beyond his own personal image and his own personal ego involved in this thing. and it's almost juvenile in the way he obsesses about this particular parade. there are a lot of soldiers, a lot of troops out there who absolutely deserve to be honored and to be heralded.

but i do think there are a lot of things the military could be doing in terms of improving their quality of life, improving their salaries, their pay, their benefits that would not be a single transitory moment, you know, rolling down pennsylvania avenue. and scott's right. it's been a while. because i can remember this. i was a young, you know, aide working for the pentagon when dick cheney was secretary of defense. we did desert victory, the parade and the flyover after that, but we'd won a major war. and it wasn't about george bush aggrandizing himself. it was about honoring the troops. i think there is a different flavor with donald trump. he's obsessive about this. and there's a certain character flaw to donald trump i think that makes him envious and wanting to have the associative property of the merit and the honor of these troops rubbed off on him that i think is a little unseemly in some ways. i don't think it is the same selflessness you'd see with a george h.w. bush or another president. >> i've got to run.

>> there's something about trump that -- i'm sorry. sorry, don. >> that's okay. i've got to run but i want to say -- i have o'get this in. the mayor of t.c. tweeting trump, saying "yep, i'm muriel bowser, mayor of washington, d.c., the local politician who finally got through to the reality star in the white house with the realities. $21.6 million of parade, events, demonstrations in trump america. sad." thank you, gentlemen. we'll be back. >> thanks. d plans. starting at $40 per line on the network you deserve.

i'm a small business, but i have... big dreams... and big plans. so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now,